Skip to content

Myanmar rejects genocide claims as a 'legitimate’ response to terrorism

As the top U.N. court begins a landmark merits trial, the military junta defends its 2017 campaign against the Rohingya.

The International Court of Justice holds hearings on Gambia's case alleging Myanmar’s military actions have breached the Genocide Convention.
The International Court of Justice holds hearings on Gambia's case alleging Myanmar’s military actions have breached the Genocide Convention. (ICJ)

Myanmar’s legal team issued a defiant defense at the Peace Palace, telling the United Nations’ highest court that its 2017 military campaign against the Rohingya minority was a "proportionate" counter-terrorism operation rather than a systematic effort to commit genocide.

The arguments on Friday marked a pivotal moment in the first full merits trial for genocide held by the International Court of Justice in more than a decade. The proceedings in The Gambia v. Myanmar have resumed at a time when the Southeast Asian nation is fractured by civil war and reeling from a catastrophic earthquake that struck last year.

This article is for paying subscribers only

Join now

Already have an account? Log in

Latest