Skip to content

When the 'technological is political.' The future of AI, for better or worse.

Equating the pursuit of 'good' with the U.N.'s 17 Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 isn't as simple as it may seem.

Technology governance reflects 'the politics of a globalized world,' says Nanjira Sambuli.
Technology governance reflects 'the politics of a globalized world,' says researcher, policy analyst and strategist Nanjira Sambuli. (AN/Steve Johnson/Unsplash)

[Editor's Note: This is part one of a two-part series this week on the future of AI.]

GENEVA (AN) — How do we determine “good” and "bad" uses for artificial intelligence as a global technology, and who decides what to do about it?

The short answer: Ethical questions are concentrated in the hands of "privileged groups," technology policy and governance expert Nanjira Sambuli tells Arete News, while governments, organizations, and regulators act as decision-makers. Consequently, most AI policy focuses on national priorities, financing, and incentives for public research and private innovation. A review of 1,920 AI policy initiatives among 69 countries, territories, and the European Union finds that just 4% tackle regulatory oversight and ethical advice.

Get full Free+ access with a free subscription

Join now

Already have an account? Log in

Latest